Difference between revisions of "Tire de-Rating"

From Vanagon Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "http://www.nhtsa.gov/cars/rules/rulings/UpgradeTire/Final/Index.html 49 CFR Part 571 Docket No. NHTSA-03-15400 RIN 2127-AI54 Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Tires ...")
 
m
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
http://www.nhtsa.gov/cars/rules/rulings/UpgradeTire/Final/Index.html  
 
http://www.nhtsa.gov/cars/rules/rulings/UpgradeTire/Final/Index.html  
49   CFR Part 571 Docket No. NHTSA-03-15400 RIN 2127-AI54 Federal Motor   Vehicle Safety Standards; Tires  
+
 
D. Tire Selection   Criteria/De-Rating of P-metric Tires  
+
 
Commenters expressed a range of   sentiments on these issues. Tire industry commenters strongly supported    retaining the de-rating percentage of 1.10 for P-metric tires used on    non-passenger car vehicles, and the proposal to revise FMVSS No. 110 to   require determination of normal load based on 85% of the load at the    vehicle placard pressure.  
+
49 CFR Part 571 Docket No. NHTSA-03-15400 RIN 2127-AI54 Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Tires  
The vehicle industry commenters supported   the extension of FMVSS No. 110 applicability to light trucks, MPVs and vans   under 10,000 GVWR, but urged the agency to retain the vehicle normal load   at 88% of the maximum load rating. The Alliance also suggested that the   agency de- link the tire selection criteria from the load parameter used in   the high-speed test, saying that no rationale exists for the   linkage. While the Alliance stated that revising the load reserve   requirement would affect areas of vehicle performance, such as braking and   CAFE, and would require some redesign of vehicle systems and   components, they did not provide specific data to support these assertions.   GM stated that 22% of its car and 6% of its light truck volumes would   not comply with the proposed tire selection criteria. Subaru   also indicated that a significant percentage of its fleet would need to   be altered to meet the proposals.  
+
 
Consumer group commenters   suggested that the agency require a higher reserve load, between 18 and 20   percent because they believe that 15% does not adequately address typical   loading conditions for trucks and heavier vehicles.  
+
 
Tire reserve   load currently refers to a tire's remaining load-carrying capabilities when   the tire is inflated to the tire manufacturer's maximum cold inflation   pressure shown on the tire sidewall and the vehicle is loaded to its gross   vehicle weight rating (GVWR). A reserve load is provided by vehicle   manufacturers, as per the requirements of FMVSS No. 110, to account for   overloading of the vehicle, under- inflation of tires, or both. The load   reserve margin required by FMVSS No. 110 is linked with the load parameter   in the FMVSS No. 109 high- speed test. The load parameter for the proposed   high speed test was 85% percent of the maximum load as labeled on the   tire.  
+
'''D. Tire Selection Criteria/De-Rating of P-metric Tires'''
The primary purpose of FMVSS No. 110 is to specify requirements   for tire selection to prevent tire overloading. Since the standard is   a vehicle-based standard, the tire selected for each vehicle to   which the standard applies is based on the load limits for the tire and   the maximum vehicle weight. The maximum load rating (in lbs or kg) for   a tire is currently determined at the maximum inflation pressure of   240 kPa (35 psi) for standard load P-metric tires. If the   vehicle manufacturer, however, chooses to recommend an inflation   pressure (labeled on the placard) lower than the maximum inflation   pressure, the actual rated load is lower than that maximum rated load   (based on maximum inflation pressure) because the tire load rating   decreases with a lower inflation pressure.[34]  
+
 
The agency believes   that the actual rated load is a more appropriate measure of load reserve   than the maximum rated load. The purpose of FMVSS No. 110 is to prevent the   overloading of a tire as installed on a vehicle, not on the tire in the   abstract. The agency has concluded, therefore, that the most appropriate   way for the vehicle manufacturer to determine the reserve load for the tire   on the vehicle is to determine the load at recommended inflation pressure   (as labeled on the placard), not at the maximum inflation pressure on the   tire sidewall, since few, if any, vehicle manufacturers list the   maximum inflation pressure as their recommended inflation    pressure.  
+
Commenters expressed a range of sentiments on these issues. Tire industry commenters strongly supported    retaining the de-rating percentage of 1.10 for P-metric tires used on    non-passenger car vehicles, and the proposal to revise FMVSS No. 110 to require determination of normal load based on 85% of the load at the    vehicle placard pressure.  
However, if FMVSS No 110 were revised as proposed in the   NPRM, vehicle manufacturers would be required to increase the reserve load   from 12 percent to 15 percent on their vehicles. Additionally, the   margin would, in fact, need to be made larger because the vehicle normal   load would be based on the load rating at the vehicle's placard   pressure rather than the load rating at the maximum inflation pressure of   the tire.  
+
 
The agency proposed an 85% figure, stating that increasing   the tire reserve needed by a vehicle under normal loading conditions from   12 to 15 percent would result in a larger margin of safety when a vehicle   is loaded to its GVWR or its tire are underinflated. Based on   comments and further analysis, the agency believes that 85% figure   combined with the load reserve being based on the load rating at   placard pressure rather than at maximum inflation pressure is   insufficiently justified at this time. Currently, the agency does not have   any data that links reserve load to tire failure. The most recent data we   have on this issue was analyzed in a 1981 study. That study found   no correlation between reserve load and tire failure. Further,   the proposed reserve load increase would have necessitated the    vehicle manufacturers' making major changes in the design of some of    their vehicles to comply with the requirement.[35] For instance,    some vehicle manufacturers for some vehicles would have had to "plus"    size the tires on their vehicles, which could, in turn, have necessitated    a redesigning of other vehicle systems such as the suspension    and braking systems.  
+
The vehicle industry commenters supported the extension of FMVSS No. 110 applicability to light trucks, MPVs and vans under 10,000 GVWR, but urged the agency to retain the vehicle normal load at 88% of the maximum load rating. The Alliance also suggested that the agency de-link the tire selection criteria from the load parameter used in the high-speed test, saying that no rationale exists for the linkage. While the Alliance stated that revising the load reserve requirement would affect areas of vehicle performance, such as braking and CAFE, and would require some redesign of vehicle systems and components, they did not provide specific data to support these assertions. GM stated that 22% of its car and 6% of its light truck volumes would not comply with the proposed tire selection criteria. Subaru also indicated that a significant percentage of its fleet would need to be altered to meet the proposals.  
In response to the vehicle manufacturers'   concerns, we have decided to de-link the tire selection criteria from the   load used in the high- speed test. The agency believes that if it were to   require that the vehicle normal load at placard pressure be no greater than   the figure specified for the load parameter in the high speed test, 85%,   too many vehicles would need a costly[36] tire upsize to comply   with requirements that do not, based on all currently available   data, appear to provide safety benefits. Further, the agency is not aware   of any safety rationale to continue to link the load reserve   requirements with the loading parameter in the high-speed test.  
+
 
For   passenger cars and for non-passenger car vehicles equipped with LT tires,   the final rule requires that the vehicle normal load be based on 94% of   load rating at the vehicle's placard pressure. Therefore, vehicle    manufacturers will be required to insure that the tire reserve load   corresponds with the tire's load carrying capabilities when the tire is   inflated to the vehicle manufacturers recommended cold tire inflation   pressure rather than the tire manufacturer's maximum cold inflation   pressure shown on the tire sidewall. The 94% figure was chosen to   approximate closely the load reserve that results from the current   requirement of 88% based of load rating at the tire's maximum inflation   pressure.  
+
Consumer group commenters suggested that the agency require a higher reserve load, between 18 and 20 percent because they believe that 15% does not adequately address typical loading conditions for trucks and heavier vehicles.  
By specifying an 94% value based on vehicle normal load, the   agency is addressing the vehicle industry's concerns that a significant   number of vehicles would otherwise need to be redesigned to   accommodate larger tire sizes, while aiming to reflect more accurately   actual vehicle loading conditions of vehicles by requiring that each   vehicle manufacturer select the appropriate reserve load for that vehicle.   The agency has recently conducted a FMVSS No. 110 vehicle normal   load evaluation and has concluded that almost all light vehicles could   meet a revised criteria for load reserve based on 94% of placard   pressure with only a minor increase, e.g., 1 or 2 psi, in this listed   inflation pressure to accommodate the new requirement. Because 1 or 2 psi   does not have a meaningful effect on the ride, comfort and,   consequently, the marketability of a vehicle, this provision should impose   little or no cost on the industry.  
+
 
For the final rule, the agency   has also decided to retain the de- rating factor of 1.10 for P-metric tires    used on non-passenger car vehicles. For non-passenger car vehicles equipped   with P-metric tires, the vehicle normal load shall be not greater than the   derated value of 94% of the tire load rating at the vehicle's placard   pressure. This de- rating provides a greater load reserve when these tires   are installed on vehicles other than passenger cars. For the first time,   this final rule requires light trucks to have a specified tire reserve, the   same as for passenger cars, under normal loading conditions.  
+
Tire reserve load currently refers to a tire's remaining load-carrying capabilities when the tire is inflated to the tire manufacturer's maximum cold inflation pressure shown on the tire sidewall and the vehicle is loaded to its gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR). A reserve load is provided by vehicle manufacturers, as per the requirements of FMVSS No. 110, to account for overloading of the vehicle, under-inflation of tires, or both. The load reserve margin required by FMVSS No. 110 is linked with the load parameter in the FMVSS No. 109 high- speed test. The load parameter for the proposed high speed test was 85% percent of the maximum load as labeled on the tire.  
The   agency has decided to retain the de-rating factor for P-metric tires used   on MPVs, trucks, and buses in part in response to widespread support from   commenters. Additionally, the agency continues to believe that the premise   behind the 10 percent de-rating of P- metric tires remains valid today.   This premise is that the reduction in the load rating is intended to   provide a safety margin for the generally harsher treatment, such as   heavier loading and possible off- road use, that passenger car tires   receive when installed on a MPV, truck, bus or trailer, instead of on a   passenger car.
+
 
 +
The primary purpose of FMVSS No. 110 is to specify requirements for tire selection to prevent tire overloading. Since the standard is a vehicle-based standard, the tire selected for each vehicle to which the standard applies is based on the load limits for the tire and the maximum vehicle weight. The maximum load rating (in lbs or kg) for a tire is currently determined at the maximum inflation pressure of 240 kPa (35 psi) for standard load P-metric tires. If the vehicle manufacturer, however, chooses to recommend an inflation pressure (labeled on the placard) lower than the maximum inflation pressure, the actual rated load is lower than that maximum rated load (based on maximum inflation pressure) because the tire load rating decreases with a lower inflation pressure.[34]  
 +
 
 +
The agency believes that the actual rated load is a more appropriate measure of load reserve than the maximum rated load. The purpose of FMVSS No. 110 is to prevent the overloading of a tire as installed on a vehicle, not on the tire in the abstract. The agency has concluded, therefore, that the most appropriate way for the vehicle manufacturer to determine the reserve load for the tire on the vehicle is to determine the load at recommended inflation pressure (as labeled on the placard), not at the maximum inflation pressure on the tire sidewall, since few, if any, vehicle manufacturers list the maximum inflation pressure as their recommended inflation    pressure.  
 +
 
 +
However, if FMVSS No 110 were revised as proposed in the NPRM, vehicle manufacturers would be required to increase the reserve load from 12 percent to 15 percent on their vehicles. Additionally, the margin would, in fact, need to be made larger because the vehicle normal load would be based on the load rating at the vehicle's placard pressure rather than the load rating at the maximum inflation pressure of the tire.
 +
 +
The agency proposed an 85% figure, stating that increasing the tire reserve needed by a vehicle under normal loading conditions from 12 to 15 percent would result in a larger margin of safety when a vehicle is loaded to its GVWR or its tire are underinflated. Based on comments and further analysis, the agency believes that 85% figure combined with the load reserve being based on the load rating at placard pressure rather than at maximum inflation pressure is insufficiently justified at this time. Currently, the agency does not have any data that links reserve load to tire failure. The most recent data we have on this issue was analyzed in a 1981 study.
 +
 
 +
That study found no correlation between reserve load and tire failure. Further, the proposed reserve load increase would have necessitated the    vehicle manufacturers' making major changes in the design of some of    their vehicles to comply with the requirement.[35] For instance,    some vehicle manufacturers for some vehicles would have had to "plus"    size the tires on their vehicles, which could, in turn, have necessitated    a redesigning of other vehicle systems such as the suspension    and braking systems.  
 +
 
 +
In response to the vehicle manufacturers' concerns, we have decided to de-link the tire selection criteria from the load used in the high- speed test. The agency believes that if it were to require that the vehicle normal load at placard pressure be no greater than the figure specified for the load parameter in the high speed test, 85%, too many vehicles would need a costly[36] tire upsize to comply with requirements that do not, based on all currently available data, appear to provide safety benefits. Further, the agency is not aware of any safety rationale to continue to link the load reserve requirements with the loading parameter in the high-speed test.  
 +
 
 +
For passenger cars and for non-passenger car vehicles equipped with LT tires, the final rule requires that the vehicle normal load be based on 94% of load rating at the vehicle's placard pressure. Therefore, vehicle    manufacturers will be required to insure that the tire reserve load corresponds with the tire's load carrying capabilities when the tire is inflated to the vehicle manufacturers recommended cold tire inflation pressure rather than the tire manufacturer's maximum cold inflation pressure shown on the tire sidewall. The 94% figure was chosen to approximate closely the load reserve that results from the current requirement of 88% based of load rating at the tire's maximum inflation pressure.  
 +
 
 +
By specifying an 94% value based on vehicle normal load, the agency is addressing the vehicle industry's concerns that a significant number of vehicles would otherwise need to be redesigned to accommodate larger tire sizes, while aiming to reflect more accurately actual vehicle loading conditions of vehicles by requiring that each vehicle manufacturer select the appropriate reserve load for that vehicle. The agency has recently conducted a FMVSS No. 110 vehicle normal load evaluation and has concluded that almost all light vehicles could meet a revised criteria for load reserve based on 94% of placard pressure with only a minor increase, e.g., 1 or 2 psi, in this listed inflation pressure to accommodate the new requirement. Because 1 or 2 psi does not have a meaningful effect on the ride, comfort and, consequently, the marketability of a vehicle, this provision should impose little or no cost on the industry.  
 +
 
 +
For the final rule, the agency has also decided to retain the de-rating factor of 1.10 for P-metric tires    used on non-passenger car vehicles. For non-passenger car vehicles equipped with P-metric tires, the vehicle normal load shall be not greater than the de-rated value of 94% of the tire load rating at the vehicle's placard pressure. This de-rating provides a greater load reserve when these tires are installed on vehicles other than passenger cars. For the first time, this final rule requires light trucks to have a specified tire reserve, the same as for passenger cars, under normal loading conditions.  
 +
 
 +
The agency has decided to retain the de-rating factor for P-metric tires used on MPVs, trucks, and buses in part in response to widespread support from commenters. Additionally, the agency continues to believe that the premise behind the 10 percent de-rating of P- metric tires remains valid today. This premise is that the reduction in the load rating is intended to provide a safety margin for the generally harsher treatment, such as heavier loading and possible off- road use, that passenger car tires receive when installed on a MPV, truck, bus or trailer, instead of on a passenger car.
 +
 
 +
''-- Content generously researched and provided by Jim Arnott''

Latest revision as of 07:25, 18 October 2011

http://www.nhtsa.gov/cars/rules/rulings/UpgradeTire/Final/Index.html


49 CFR Part 571 Docket No. NHTSA-03-15400 RIN 2127-AI54 Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Tires


D. Tire Selection Criteria/De-Rating of P-metric Tires

Commenters expressed a range of sentiments on these issues. Tire industry commenters strongly supported retaining the de-rating percentage of 1.10 for P-metric tires used on non-passenger car vehicles, and the proposal to revise FMVSS No. 110 to require determination of normal load based on 85% of the load at the vehicle placard pressure.

The vehicle industry commenters supported the extension of FMVSS No. 110 applicability to light trucks, MPVs and vans under 10,000 GVWR, but urged the agency to retain the vehicle normal load at 88% of the maximum load rating. The Alliance also suggested that the agency de-link the tire selection criteria from the load parameter used in the high-speed test, saying that no rationale exists for the linkage. While the Alliance stated that revising the load reserve requirement would affect areas of vehicle performance, such as braking and CAFE, and would require some redesign of vehicle systems and components, they did not provide specific data to support these assertions. GM stated that 22% of its car and 6% of its light truck volumes would not comply with the proposed tire selection criteria. Subaru also indicated that a significant percentage of its fleet would need to be altered to meet the proposals.

Consumer group commenters suggested that the agency require a higher reserve load, between 18 and 20 percent because they believe that 15% does not adequately address typical loading conditions for trucks and heavier vehicles.

Tire reserve load currently refers to a tire's remaining load-carrying capabilities when the tire is inflated to the tire manufacturer's maximum cold inflation pressure shown on the tire sidewall and the vehicle is loaded to its gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR). A reserve load is provided by vehicle manufacturers, as per the requirements of FMVSS No. 110, to account for overloading of the vehicle, under-inflation of tires, or both. The load reserve margin required by FMVSS No. 110 is linked with the load parameter in the FMVSS No. 109 high- speed test. The load parameter for the proposed high speed test was 85% percent of the maximum load as labeled on the tire.

The primary purpose of FMVSS No. 110 is to specify requirements for tire selection to prevent tire overloading. Since the standard is a vehicle-based standard, the tire selected for each vehicle to which the standard applies is based on the load limits for the tire and the maximum vehicle weight. The maximum load rating (in lbs or kg) for a tire is currently determined at the maximum inflation pressure of 240 kPa (35 psi) for standard load P-metric tires. If the vehicle manufacturer, however, chooses to recommend an inflation pressure (labeled on the placard) lower than the maximum inflation pressure, the actual rated load is lower than that maximum rated load (based on maximum inflation pressure) because the tire load rating decreases with a lower inflation pressure.[34]

The agency believes that the actual rated load is a more appropriate measure of load reserve than the maximum rated load. The purpose of FMVSS No. 110 is to prevent the overloading of a tire as installed on a vehicle, not on the tire in the abstract. The agency has concluded, therefore, that the most appropriate way for the vehicle manufacturer to determine the reserve load for the tire on the vehicle is to determine the load at recommended inflation pressure (as labeled on the placard), not at the maximum inflation pressure on the tire sidewall, since few, if any, vehicle manufacturers list the maximum inflation pressure as their recommended inflation pressure.

However, if FMVSS No 110 were revised as proposed in the NPRM, vehicle manufacturers would be required to increase the reserve load from 12 percent to 15 percent on their vehicles. Additionally, the margin would, in fact, need to be made larger because the vehicle normal load would be based on the load rating at the vehicle's placard pressure rather than the load rating at the maximum inflation pressure of the tire.

The agency proposed an 85% figure, stating that increasing the tire reserve needed by a vehicle under normal loading conditions from 12 to 15 percent would result in a larger margin of safety when a vehicle is loaded to its GVWR or its tire are underinflated. Based on comments and further analysis, the agency believes that 85% figure combined with the load reserve being based on the load rating at placard pressure rather than at maximum inflation pressure is insufficiently justified at this time. Currently, the agency does not have any data that links reserve load to tire failure. The most recent data we have on this issue was analyzed in a 1981 study.

That study found no correlation between reserve load and tire failure. Further, the proposed reserve load increase would have necessitated the vehicle manufacturers' making major changes in the design of some of their vehicles to comply with the requirement.[35] For instance, some vehicle manufacturers for some vehicles would have had to "plus" size the tires on their vehicles, which could, in turn, have necessitated a redesigning of other vehicle systems such as the suspension and braking systems.

In response to the vehicle manufacturers' concerns, we have decided to de-link the tire selection criteria from the load used in the high- speed test. The agency believes that if it were to require that the vehicle normal load at placard pressure be no greater than the figure specified for the load parameter in the high speed test, 85%, too many vehicles would need a costly[36] tire upsize to comply with requirements that do not, based on all currently available data, appear to provide safety benefits. Further, the agency is not aware of any safety rationale to continue to link the load reserve requirements with the loading parameter in the high-speed test.

For passenger cars and for non-passenger car vehicles equipped with LT tires, the final rule requires that the vehicle normal load be based on 94% of load rating at the vehicle's placard pressure. Therefore, vehicle manufacturers will be required to insure that the tire reserve load corresponds with the tire's load carrying capabilities when the tire is inflated to the vehicle manufacturers recommended cold tire inflation pressure rather than the tire manufacturer's maximum cold inflation pressure shown on the tire sidewall. The 94% figure was chosen to approximate closely the load reserve that results from the current requirement of 88% based of load rating at the tire's maximum inflation pressure.

By specifying an 94% value based on vehicle normal load, the agency is addressing the vehicle industry's concerns that a significant number of vehicles would otherwise need to be redesigned to accommodate larger tire sizes, while aiming to reflect more accurately actual vehicle loading conditions of vehicles by requiring that each vehicle manufacturer select the appropriate reserve load for that vehicle. The agency has recently conducted a FMVSS No. 110 vehicle normal load evaluation and has concluded that almost all light vehicles could meet a revised criteria for load reserve based on 94% of placard pressure with only a minor increase, e.g., 1 or 2 psi, in this listed inflation pressure to accommodate the new requirement. Because 1 or 2 psi does not have a meaningful effect on the ride, comfort and, consequently, the marketability of a vehicle, this provision should impose little or no cost on the industry.

For the final rule, the agency has also decided to retain the de-rating factor of 1.10 for P-metric tires used on non-passenger car vehicles. For non-passenger car vehicles equipped with P-metric tires, the vehicle normal load shall be not greater than the de-rated value of 94% of the tire load rating at the vehicle's placard pressure. This de-rating provides a greater load reserve when these tires are installed on vehicles other than passenger cars. For the first time, this final rule requires light trucks to have a specified tire reserve, the same as for passenger cars, under normal loading conditions.

The agency has decided to retain the de-rating factor for P-metric tires used on MPVs, trucks, and buses in part in response to widespread support from commenters. Additionally, the agency continues to believe that the premise behind the 10 percent de-rating of P- metric tires remains valid today. This premise is that the reduction in the load rating is intended to provide a safety margin for the generally harsher treatment, such as heavier loading and possible off- road use, that passenger car tires receive when installed on a MPV, truck, bus or trailer, instead of on a passenger car.

-- Content generously researched and provided by Jim Arnott